[{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/najvyssi-sud-v-usa-je-skepticky-voci-spolocnosti-intel-ktory-je-v-spore-o-dochodkove-fondy\/#Article","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/najvyssi-sud-v-usa-je-skepticky-voci-spolocnosti-intel-ktory-je-v-spore-o-dochodkove-fondy\/","headline":"Najvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed s\u00fad v USA je skeptick\u00fd vo\u010di spolo\u010dnosti Intel ktor\u00fd je v spore o d\u00f4chodkov\u00e9 fondy","name":"Najvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed s\u00fad v USA je skeptick\u00fd vo\u010di spolo\u010dnosti Intel ktor\u00fd je v spore o d\u00f4chodkov\u00e9 fondy","description":"Sudcovia Najvy\u0161\u0161ieho s\u00fadu USA sa v stredu zdali by\u0165 skeptick\u00ed vo\u010di snahe pre spolo\u010dnos\u0165 Intel, aby sa vyhli \u017ealobe, ktor\u00e1 by ju obvi\u0148ovala z poru\u0161enia…","datePublished":"2019-12-02","dateModified":"2023-04-27","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/author\/#Person","name":"","url":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/author\/","identifier":1,"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/42264ea8f5170010011c6bbf811aa6c31c20ad3acf2a9bd21dca0746ea8c832a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/42264ea8f5170010011c6bbf811aa6c31c20ad3acf2a9bd21dca0746ea8c832a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"jvema.sk","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"\/logo.png","url":"\/logo.png","width":600,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/wp-content\/uploads\/img_a309031_w16861_t1577623507.jpg","url":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/wp-content\/uploads\/img_a309031_w16861_t1577623507.jpg","height":0,"width":0},"url":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/najvyssi-sud-v-usa-je-skepticky-voci-spolocnosti-intel-ktory-je-v-spore-o-dochodkove-fondy\/","about":["Biznis"],"wordCount":517,"articleBody":"Sudcovia Najvy\u0161\u0161ieho s\u00fadu USA sa v stredu zdali by\u0165 skeptick\u00ed vo\u010di snahe pre spolo\u010dnos\u0165 Intel, aby sa vyhli \u017ealobe, ktor\u00e1 by ju obvi\u0148ovala z poru\u0161enia feder\u00e1lneho z\u00e1kona pri investovan\u00ed do d\u00f4chodkov\u00e9ho pl\u00e1nu zamestnancov, ktor\u00fd stoj\u00ed pr\u00edjemcov stovky mili\u00f3nov dol\u00e1rov. Sudcovia si vypo\u010duli hodinu argumentov v r\u00e1mci odvolania Intelu proti rozhodnutiu ni\u017e\u0161ieho s\u00fadu, ktor\u00fdm sa obnovuje navrhovan\u00e1 \u017ealoba o skupinov\u00fa \u017ealobu, ktor\u00fa sudca rozhodol v roku 2017, boli podan\u00e9 pr\u00edli\u0161 neskoro. Pr\u00edpad je d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00fd pre spolo\u010dnosti, preto\u017ee byt to mohlo pred\u013a\u017ei\u0165 \u010das, po\u010das ktor\u00e9ho mus\u00ed ve\u013ea pr\u00edjemcov poda\u0165 \u017ealobu, \u010do by mohlo vies\u0165, k vy\u0161\u0161\u00edm \u0161kod\u00e1m. Zdalo sa, \u017ee konzervat\u00edvni a liber\u00e1lni sudcovia sympatizuj\u00fa s b\u00fdval\u00fdm zamestnancom spolo\u010dnosti Intel, ktor\u00fd v roku 2015 podali \u017ealobu, v ktorej tvrdili, \u017ee nemaj\u00fa \u201eskuto\u010dne vedomosti\u201c o \u00fadajn\u00fdch investi\u010dn\u00fdch probl\u00e9moch, preto\u017ee ne\u010d\u00edtali pr\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e9 dokumenty, ktor\u00e9 boli zverejnen\u00e9 iba online. \u201eV\u00e4\u010d\u0161ina \u013eud\u00ed ich ne\u010d\u00edta, alebo mnoho,\u201c uviedla konzervat\u00edvna sudky\u0148a Brett Kavanaugh. \u201eAko teda m\u00e1\u0161 skuto\u010dne vedomosti, ak si ich ne\u010d\u00edtal?\u201c \u201eMus\u00edm poveda\u0165, \u017ee ne\u010d\u00edtam v\u0161etky spr\u00e1vy, ktor\u00e9 dost\u00e1vam o svojich invest\u00edci\u00e1ch,\u201c zopakovala liber\u00e1lna spravodlivos\u0165 Ruth Bader Ginsdburg. Sporn\u00fdm je \u010dasov\u00e9 obdobie \u00fadajn\u00e9ho poru\u0161enia z\u00e1kona o zabezpe\u010den\u00ed pr\u00edjmu z d\u00f4chodku zamestnancov, feder\u00e1lny z\u00e1kon, ktor\u00fd vy\u017eaduje, aby mana\u017e\u00e9ri pl\u00e1nov obozretne investovali. Pr\u00edjemcovia maj\u00fa spravidla \u0161es\u0165 rokov na to, aby sa dom\u00e1hali nespr\u00e1vnych investi\u010dn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed. Ak je probl\u00e9m zn\u00e1my sk\u00f4r, t\u00e1to lehota sa skr\u00e1ti na tri roky- S\u00fad, ktor\u00fd podal b\u00fdval\u00fd in\u017einier spolo\u010dnosti Intel Christopher Sulyma, obvinil podnikov\u00e9 d\u00f4chodkov\u00e9 pl\u00e1ny a spr\u00e1vcov z poru\u0161enia ich zvereneck\u00fdch povinnost\u00ed \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edkom t\u00fdm, \u017ee na rozdiel od partnersk\u00fdch fondov kladie pr\u00edli\u0161 ve\u013ek\u00fd d\u00f4raz na hed\u017eov\u00e9 fondy a s\u00fakromn\u00fd kapit\u00e1l. Sulyma, podporovan\u00e1 administrat\u00edvou pr\u00edpadu prezidenta Donalda Trumpa, uviedla, \u017ee zatia\u013e \u010do v spolo\u010dnosti Intel pracoval v rokoch 2010 a\u017e 2012, nevedel o alternat\u00edvnych invest\u00edci\u00e1ch do online dokumentov, \u017ee vykon\u00e1vali zle alebo dokonca \u010do boli hed\u017eov\u00e9 fondy. Intel so s\u00eddlom v Kalifornii uviedol, \u017ee \u017ealoba by sa mala vyhodi\u0165, preto\u017ee \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edci fondu vedeli o tejto z\u00e1le\u017eitosti viac ako tri roky pred t\u00fdm, ako bola \u017ealoba podan\u00e1 na z\u00e1klade e-mailov, ktor\u00e9 spolo\u010dnos\u0165 zaslala s odkazmi na dokumenty o invest\u00edci\u00e1ch. Invest\u00edcie boli vybran\u00e9 s cie\u013eom lep\u0161ie diverzifikova\u0165 portf\u00f3lia pl\u00e1nov, uviedla firma. Minul\u00fd rok odvolac\u00ed s\u00fad USA pre obvody v San Franciscu v tejto veci rozhodol o pokra\u010dovan\u00ed konania a rozhodol, \u017ee trojro\u010dn\u00e1 lehota sa uplat\u0148uje iba v pr\u00edpade, \u017ee firma Sulyma skuto\u010dne vedela o skuto\u010dnostiach poru\u0161enia, nielen \u017ee tieto skuto\u010dnosti boli k dispoz\u00edcii.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        4.3\/5 - (11 votes)        "},{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Najvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed s\u00fad v USA je skeptick\u00fd vo\u010di spolo\u010dnosti Intel ktor\u00fd je v spore o d\u00f4chodkov\u00e9 fondy","item":"https:\/\/www.jvema.sk\/najvyssi-sud-v-usa-je-skepticky-voci-spolocnosti-intel-ktory-je-v-spore-o-dochodkove-fondy\/#breadcrumbitem"}]}]